Monday, November 9, 2009

HW #9 Meursault

Meursault is one of the most characters compered to other books I have read. In fact that is the reason why Marie his girlfriend was so appealed by him. Mersault does not care about anything. He belives that it is all meaningless and that it is impossible to change our life. As the story begins, there are different situations and Meursault does not show his feelings in any of them. In fact, sometimes he is not even part of what is going on around him. Like how Dylan said "Meursault is detached from the moments". When his Maman died, in the funeral, all Meursault could think about was how hot it was and did not show any type of sorrow for his mother's death. One thing I did notice is that Meursault begins to become more expressive as the storyline continues. In page 45, Meursault says that he loves his Maman very much and that he did not realize why he said that until then. But then he becomes the robot that he was once again. although for the most part Is almost as if he does not realize what is really going on around him and the importance of any case. When he was pinched for killing the Arab, he did not express madness, or any type of regret. I have met people like Meursault in real life and have been obligated to spend time with them. I knew this man who is all alone, stays home all day and endures the same routine he has had fro over twenty years. It is depressing! there is no ambition, or hope in the environment. It also feels very energy consuming and it is not pleasant. We must live life with ambition and curiosity. Every time I read The Stranger very neutral and just like Meursault, Without any emotion.

Thursday, October 29, 2009

Hw #8 Who is Meursault

In the book The Stranger, Protagonist Meursault is a depressed men that is detached from his mother and the people around him. In the beginning of the book Meursault's mother dies and he does not show any kind of feelings or reactions. He just goes to his boss at work and asks him if he can take days off to arrange the funeral and the come back straight to becoming the working zombie that he is. This shows that Meursault is completely emotionless and is living just to get through life. Once Meursault is where his mother is being held, he mentions that in the past visiting his mother was always a burden. He says that he did not go to visit her because "it took up my Sunday not to mention the trouble of getting to the bus, buying tickets, and spending two hours traveling". This also shows that his relationship with his mother was not very stable. These are the words of a cold and selfish man. As I read the book, It seems that Meursault is narrating his life rather than living it. It makes me feel pretty neutral. It just feels as if a story if a narrator is telling the story. Everything that happens is just being said but there are no inner thoughts about why or how. He never releases his feelings and I always resolves to smoking when he is under some kind of stress. I understand why Meursault might have not very expressive when his mother died because he was not very close to her. I have family members that by orthodox values should be very close to me but unfortunately are not and nowadays when they decide to make a major decision that I am not aware of until after they have done it, I am not very much affected by it because they do not feel part of my life to me. However, it does not seem that Meursalt is not making a effort connected with other people and that is why he is isolated from society.

Sunday, October 25, 2009

HW#7 Do we live in a world that is meaningful and makes sense?

To us humans, everything scientifically and mathematically makes sense. Everything has a logical explanation to why things happen in our planet, but in reality, nobody can really prove that it really makes sense. We live in a system invented and structured by human beings. we follow rules and the order of life but it is all really just fake. Everything around us is fake. It is a system that we have gotten used to since the begging of time and we have gotten used to thinking that it is the right way to live. we are supposed to go to school, have jobs, industrialize, modernize, etc, but who says that that is the right way to life? Also, nobody really knows what our purpose in life is so we do not know if we are doing what we are really suppose to and maybe the world we live in does not make sense. Now, is the world we live in meaningful? yes, well, I hope it is. It must have some kind of meaning or else we would not exist. But even though i belive there must be a meaning to our world, nobody can prove to us that we really live in a meaningful world. In the movie "I Heart Huckabees" protagonist, Albert Markovski, tries to find himself and the answers to life biggest mysteries. He encounters an inexplicable coincidence and attempts to figure out what the meaning of it is if it even has a meaning. Later on Albert discovers that the coincidence did not have much of a purpose and it was just a coincidence. Many rare coincidences have happened in my life. Many of them have been so impossible that sometimes i think that it could have to do with a higher power such as destiny which I believe exists but there is no actual prove so it could just be a coincidence. Albert makes a friend, Tommy, who helps Albert find himself. In the beginning of the movie Albert talks about a rock. A rock has no meaning, it just sits there, it doesn't think or act in any way, Albert thinks to himself. Albert and Tommy do exercises to stop thinking and find nothingness just like the rock. They accomplish to empty their mind for a few seconds by hitting each other in the face with a ball. At that moment they were equivelant to the rock. unable to think or act in anyway. Without much meaning. Does this mean that even though we are able to move and think, we are still like the meaningless rock? does something have to be alive to the human perspective in order to have a meaning? I personally do believe and hope that the world we live in has a meaning. Even though there is no way to prove it, I believe it does or else we would not be here in the first place. However I do not believe that the world and everything we live around makes sense. Us human beings try to make sense of things and make it reasonable in our own way.

Saturday, October 3, 2009

HW #6 Blog Comments

Hi Rachel,

Its cool that you stated what happiness means to you. however, You did not agree or disagree with David Banach's lecture. You should be trying to argue a point and not just assert your opinion. You should also give examples and make connections. I would recommend you rethink when you wrote, "you will never find happiness if you don't challenge your weakness and change yourself from within"? What if we are happy with who we are and do not want to change anything about ourselves?

-Juan Soteldo


Hey Ian,

I really like your creativity, its funny how you made me take my cellphone and wallet out of my pockets. I completely agree with you that we are forced to believe a piece of paper means power and the more we have it, the better we are.

I was watching a show last night where a man was completely broke and he felt as if he was "drowning". Even though he was healthy and had a family that loved him. Then he became a gigolo in order become rich because he though he was going to obtain more power.

HAHAHA "less leg hair"

I understand what you mean when you say that materialistic things will only keeps us happy for a certain amount of time. How were are brainwashed and stuck in a cycle in which we feel like we must continue purchasing those things in order to maintain our happiness.

-Juan Soteldo

Friday, October 2, 2009

HW #5

In David Banach's lectures, he argues that true happiness comes from within, "If we find ourselves isolated from external value by our own radical individuality, we can make a world of ourselves, a universe of our own experience". What David Banach is trying to say is that people should be less materialistic and less infatuated with external values in order to find true happiness. I disagree with Banach's idea because it is too radical. He is almost saying that we must be autistic in order to find true happiness. I do believe that that people need less materialistic and more realistic with what is important and what is disposable, but there are other external values that offer us happiness. One of them being the people around us such as our friends, and family. Those people are all part of our external value and create each of our individual happiness. How can somebody be truly happy without being loved by someone or without giving love to someone?

David Banach uses the story of "The Myth of Sisyphus" as an example of how everything we do in our lives is worthless since we will die someday. I strongly disagree because if that is the case, then why not kill ourselves right now? I know it sounds a little emo but life must have a meaning or else we would not exist. There are other things we love and bring us happiness that are not alive such as our careers. Even though at the end, everything does lead to death, we need obstacles to achieve in order to feel importance and happiness or else life would be very boring. There are many external things in our life that offer us inner happiness but we just need to find out which ones are the ones that truly have an importance and a purpose.

Tuesday, September 29, 2009

HW #4 Blog Comments

Rachel

I feel like you are taking a "rebel without a cause" approach to the way you disagree with David Banach's lecture. You are only including yourself in your examples in order to back up your argument. I would recommend to exclude yourself and give more general points of view. I also found it humorous that you assert David Banach is fake through his writing and imply he knows a lot of fakes

-Juan Soteldo


Hannah,

All your examples and ideas are very interesting to read. I like how you made connections to your personal experiences in things like your art and your defiance to your ex-boyfriend with reading the twilight series. I agree with Jace when he said that you were not acting in "bad faith", but instead challenging somebody to let them know that you are not under their control.
I'm really curious to know who in particular are the members of the so called "rain boot crew" hahaha
You mention that if people do not like what your wear, then "it's too bad for them". This shows that you have personality and you are not trying to be somebody else in order to fit in.

-Juan Soteldo

Thursday, September 24, 2009

HW #3

We as human beings are not physically free of our appearance or external circumstances. "Am I free to become Barrack Obama right now? Am I free to become a woman? Am I free to close my eyes right now and find myself in the Bahamas when I reopen them?" asks David Banach. We might not be free to do any of these things but we do have endless internal capabilities. In our minds, we are allowed to do whatever we want. We are free to have our own opinion, we are free to believe and "we have the power to edit the frames which constitute our experience into the film that is to be our life".

The only person that impedes a you from being yourself is you. Nobody can tell us that we can not laugh or cry when we want to. Or that we can not act a certain way because it does not go along with our personality. We as human beings should not intend to be somebody else only because a person in our life makes us feel that way. Having a "mental TV screen" of oneself could be fake because that person might be trying to be somebody else just to fit in, but sometimes it can also be a good thing if it is for our freedom of happiness. If a person decides to change an aspect of himself in order to improve his personality rather than to fit in then it would not be considered trying to be somebody you are not. For example, somebody is different when he is around other people by being less social or less humorous, and then the person decides he should try to be as genuine as possible with everyone. Therefore he will be an absolute individual and internally free from all outside influences.

Tuesday, September 22, 2009

hw #2 Blog Comments

Rachel C

I feel like you have a lot of good questions to write your opinion but i think you need to go more in depth with your argument. In your own opinion, you should write more about what you think is absolute individualism. Also making connections helps the reader to understand your ideas.
-Juan Soteldo

Katherine V
ummmm... I fell like you need to expand your idea more.
-Juan Soteldo

Wednesday, September 16, 2009

HW #1 The Ethics of Absolute Freedom

Through out out my life I have always wondered if what we live is fiction or reality. What proofs us that what we see actually exists or that other people are other actual human beings that think and feel like we do. Like how David Banach says "we cannot feel what is going on in anyone else's mind". We are trapped victims of our own mind. There is not objective way to know and feel like the other person. We can only try to understand people by what they tell us and feel the way they do comparing with own life experiences. Sometimes I see it if I am the only person alive and living in a made up world with fictional people. It feels like life is a novel and I am the protagonist in the story. According to David Banach "we are minds trapped in our bodies" which is true in the perspective that our mind is all we have. It is our best friend since we connect with it all day and I think that is what David Banach means by Absolute Individuality.

Regarding the fact that it is impossible to know exactly what someone else is feeling, there are times that assure me that what I am living is real. When I'm with a person who I really connect with and feel comfortable with, all doubts about reality immediately abolish. Also, I believe in a human sense when people have a mental connection even though they are not talking. Remember the example I gave last year in your class that everyone though was cheesy and funny? About when sometimes I am in the subway and i see a complete stranger and have a connection with that person and we each know the connection is going on even thouh we are not talking.

Another way I am one step closer to feeling a true connection with another human being is with emotions. Emotions are what makes us human. Without emotions we would be just like robots. When someone around me feels very happy or sad I sense that they too are living their own lives. A life full of struggles and obstacles. That they also have curious minds and wonder these concepts.

Once again there is not objective way of knowing that what we are living is real. That everyone around us has the capability of feeling what we feel. We are victims of our own minds and live in an absolute individuality. The only thing we can do is have faith in what we believe in and let our instincts guide us.